Leon,
If you can, eliminate the drawing for the old CS-14 phenolic piece.
It would be best to move the new CS-14 onto the phenolic sheet. I was
planning
on gluing the sheets to the material, then drilling, the cutting the
outlines.
Glen
Original Message
From: 'Leon - C' <
leon@...
>
To: <
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Q1_Aircraft] drawing
> 0.125' is correct for the flat aluminum parts. Thanks for the proof
> read -
> and keep those eyes open for more. In the process of updating the files.
> =================
> Leon
>
Original Message
> From: 'G B' <
microsys@...
>
> To: <
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Q1_Aircraft] drawing
>
>
>> I am replying to my own inquiry...
>>
>> I found the plans CD and
>> INDEED the 0.25' is WRONG, and these parts are 0.125'
>>
>> Leon take note and revise that sheet.
>>
>> Glen
>>
>>
Original Message
>> From: 'G B' <
microsys@...
>
>> To: 'Q1_Aircraft' <
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:22 AM
>> Subject: [Q1_Aircraft] drawing
>>
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I am reviewing the templates for various parts, and think there is an
>> > error
>> > in
>> > Leon's drawings. Please help.
>> >
>> > I see that it calls for CS-17, CS-11, etc to be 0.25' 2024-T3.
>> >
>> > On all my other planes, these similar parts were 0.125' aluminum. What
> is
>> > the correct
>> > thickness?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Glen
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>